<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Your Suspect &#187; IAC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yoursuspect.com/tag/iac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yoursuspect.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 12:22:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Citysearch Acquires Insider Pages</title>
		<link>http://yoursuspect.com/2007/03/01/citysearch-acquires-insider-pages/</link>
		<comments>http://yoursuspect.com/2007/03/01/citysearch-acquires-insider-pages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 16:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Saren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Local Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citysearch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insider pages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well first, I&#8217;m just glad I didn&#8217;t have to watch this get drawn out. Some M&#38;A rumors have a way of getting way out of control. Theories, <a href="http://www.praized.com/blog/local/insiderpagescom-is-for-sale-how-much-is-it-worth/" target="_blank">napkin calculations</a>, he said-she said. But about two weeks ago <a href="http://www.praized.com/blog/local/insiderpagescom-is-for-sale-how-much-is-it-worth/" target="_blank">the rumor began</a>, and here we are with <a href="http://venturebeat.com/2007/02/28/citysearch-snaps-up-insider-pages-in-local-search-race/" target="_blank">the news that Citysearch has acquired Insider Pages for an undisclosed amount</a>. I&#8217;ve referenced various sites and blogs, that I regularly read, at the end of this post and will continue to add to this list as it grows and opinions are voiced.</p>
<p>Ultimately, I&#8217;m not an M&#38;A expert and <em>I can&#8217;t </em>&#8230; <a href="http://yoursuspect.com/2007/03/01/citysearch-acquires-insider-pages/" class="read_more">Read more</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well first, I&#8217;m just glad I didn&#8217;t have to watch this get drawn out. Some M&amp;A rumors have a way of getting way out of control. Theories, <a href="http://www.praized.com/blog/local/insiderpagescom-is-for-sale-how-much-is-it-worth/" target="_blank">napkin calculations</a>, he said-she said. But about two weeks ago <a href="http://www.praized.com/blog/local/insiderpagescom-is-for-sale-how-much-is-it-worth/" target="_blank">the rumor began</a>, and here we are with <a href="http://venturebeat.com/2007/02/28/citysearch-snaps-up-insider-pages-in-local-search-race/" target="_blank">the news that Citysearch has acquired Insider Pages for an undisclosed amount</a>. I&#8217;ve referenced various sites and blogs, that I regularly read, at the end of this post and will continue to add to this list as it grows and opinions are voiced.</p>
<p>Ultimately, I&#8217;m not an M&amp;A expert and <em>I can&#8217;t even begin</em> to estimate Insider Pages valuation. I&#8217;ll leave that to others, and <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/#comments" target="_blank">already there are theories, critiques, shock, even applause</a>. I think <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/" target="_blank">the rumored price</a> is interesting though. Insider Pages, an Idea Lab company if I&#8217;m not mistaken, <a href="http://sanjose.bizjournals.com/sanjose/stories/2006/03/27/daily8.html" target="_blank">raised somewhere around $9M over just about a year ago</a>. Let me say that again: $9,000,000 raised 1 year ago.</p>
<p>My jaw is firmly stuck to the floor. I think my shock is obvious, but perhaps I should shed a little more light on it, and it&#8217;s really quite simple &#8211; $9M in two years and they couldn&#8217;t do better than that and only get acquired for $12M? You know, I betcha someone is popping the cork on some expensive bottle of champagne too, while packing away Aeron chairs and a Brunswick pool table. Someone is celebrating. Others are not too pleased. I can&#8217;t imagine the investors are very happy. <strong>I&#8217;m sorry but I think this is sadder news for the rest of us. </strong></p>
<p>If anyone out there wants to talk about the bubble, or is reminded by events over the past year that smell like the bubble, let me just say that <em>this is not helping the cause</em>. It&#8217;s activity and deals like this that spoil it for the rest of us! It&#8217;s bad enough that I have to contend with macro economics, fed chiefs talking about recessions, market drop offs that look like an algebraic symbol on a chalkboard, but now I gotta contend with this? Frankly, I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;re even remotely close to a dot-com bubble, but there <em>are</em> skeptics and theorists, and this Insider Pages activity only gives them more ammunition.</p>
<p>So, congratulations to Insider Pages. Congratulations to IAC and Citysearch.</p>
<p>I look forward to IAC imploding the Insider Pages brand, extracting the marrow from Insider Pages &#8216;database, and cross-breeding it with Citysearch&#8217;s database, and only making a bigger mess. If there were loyal Insider Pages users and/or customers, I&#8217;m quite comfortable predicting that they&#8217;re all going to fade away and find another site/service that had the same values that first attracted them.</p>
<p>Hey, IAC is a contender, I recognize them, I give them props, and ya gotta respect them &#8211; they&#8217;re the monster around the corner.</p>
<p>Some whales eat krill, others feed on schooling fish. IAC is a whale, and clearly this whale needs to eat. It should be interesting to see how long this meal lasts for them, until they get hungry again.</p>
<p>Links:</p>
<p>March 1, 2007:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://venturebeat.com/2007/02/28/citysearch-snaps-up-insider-pages-in-local-search-race/" target="_blank">VentureBeat</a> (eat your veggies and meat first)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-citysearch-to-acquire-local-search-review-site-insiderpages/" target="_blank">Paid Content</a></li>
<li><a href="http://gesterling.wordpress.com/2007/03/01/citysearch-buys-insiderpages/" target="_blank">Greg Sterling</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/" target="_blank">TechCrunch </a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.praized.com/blog/local/citysearch-buys-insiderpages-for-an-undisclosed-price/" target="_blank">Praized</a></li>
</ul>
<p>March 2, 2007:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://gesterling.wordpress.com/2007/03/01/citysearch-insiderpages-take-two/" target="_blank">Greg Sterling, take 2</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/2007/03/01/two-more-cents-on-citysearchinsider-pages/" target="_blank">Small Business SEM</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yoursuspect.com/2007/03/01/citysearch-acquires-insider-pages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

